City of Evansville v. Cunningham

208 N.E.2d 476, 247 Ind. 46, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 302
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 30, 1965
DocketNo. 19,568
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 208 N.E.2d 476 (City of Evansville v. Cunningham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Evansville v. Cunningham, 208 N.E.2d 476, 247 Ind. 46, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 302 (Ind. 1965).

Opinions

[47]*47On Petition to Transfer

Per Curiam.

Transfer of said cause to this Court is denied for the reason that it was error for the trial court to give to the jury appellee’s instruction No. 11. We do not, however, by our denial of transfer necessarily approve that portion of the Appellate Court’s opinion with regard to the giving of appellee’s instruction No. 7, the giving of appellant City of Evansville’s instruction No. 5, and the refusal to give appellant Craig’s instruction No. 16.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Evansville v. Cunningham
208 N.E.2d 476 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1965)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 N.E.2d 476, 247 Ind. 46, 1965 Ind. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-evansville-v-cunningham-ind-1965.