City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
819 A.2d 1191, 572 Pa. 693, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 600
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board. Read the opinion of the Court — 575 Pa. 594 →
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 14, 2003·No. Petition No. 351 W.D. Allocatur Docket 2002·Published
Opinion
AMENDED ORDER
AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issues:
1. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed error in concluding that Annunziata is entitled to both full Heart and Lung pay from the City of Erie and Workers’ Compensation benefits simply because he held concurrent positions with other employers.
2. Whether, even if the Commonwealth Court correctly ruled that Annunziata is entitled to Workers’ Compensation benefits and Heart and Lung pay in light of his concurrent employment, the Commonwealth Court committed error in not directing Annunziata to forward his workers’ compensation pay to the City of Erie under Section 637(a) of the Pennsylvania Heart and Lung Act, 53 P.S. Section 637(a).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 819 A.2d 1191, 572 Pa. 693, 2003 Pa. LEXIS 600 (Pa. 2003).
819 A.2d 1191 (City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.