City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board

819 A.2d 1191
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided April 14, 2003·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

AMENDED ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 2003, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is hereby granted, limited to the following issues:

1. Whether the Commonwealth Court committed error in concluding that An-nunziata is entitled to both full Heart and Lung pay from the City of Erie and Workers’ Compensation benefits simply because he held concurrent positions with other employers.
2. Whether, even if the Commonwealth Court correctly ruled that Annunziata is entitled to Workers’ Compensation benefits and Heart and Lung pay in light of his concurrent employment, the Commonwealth Court committed error in not directing Annunziata to forward his workers’ compensation pay to the City of Erie under Section 637(a) of the Pennsylvania Heart and Lung Act, 53 P.S. Section 637(a).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, 819 A.2d 1191 (Pa. 2003).

819 A.2d 1191 (City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

City of Erie v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
838 A.2d 598 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2003)