City of Dover v. City of Russellville

213 S.W.3d 1, 363 Ark. 248
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Dover v. City of Russellville. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 Ark. 458
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 15, 2005·No. 04-1112·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The City of Dover appeals from a judgment entered June 29, 2004, “and from all orders entered prior to that date.” However, in violation of Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(a)(8), the notice of appeal is not included in the Addendum. Pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 4-2(b)(3), this court finds that the Addendum is deficient, and the appellant is granted fifteen days from the date of the entry of this order within which to file an amended Addendum. It is a practical impossibility for seven justices to examine a single transcript filed with this court. Villines v. Harris, 361 Ark. 111, 204 S.W.3d 520 (2005). Further, this court may affirm the judgment under Ark. R. Sup. Ct. 4-2(b)(3) if an amended Addendum is not filed within the fifteen days.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Dover v. City of Russellville, 213 S.W.3d 1, 363 Ark. 248 (Ark. 2005).

213 S.W.3d 1 (City of Dover v. City of Russellville) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Villines v. Harris
204 S.W.3d 520 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)