City of Detroit Pub. Works Dept. v. Local 77, Afscme

Michigan Court of Appeals

City of Detroit Pub. Works Dept. v. Local 77, Afscme

190 N.W.2d 700, 34 Mich. App. 159, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2045, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1592

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 27, 1971

DocketDocket 11759

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 190 N.W.2d 700 (City of Detroit Pub. Works Dept. v. Local 77, Afscme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

City of Detroit Pub. Works Dept. v. Local 77, Afscme, 190 N.W.2d 700, 34 Mich. App. 159, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2045, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1592 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals the lower court refusal to issue an order directing defendant employees to work overtime. This Court issued a temporary restraining order directing defendants, sanitation workers in the employ of the City of Detroit, from engaging in any work stoppage or refusing to work overtime hours as ordered by the city, pending a full hearing by this Court and an opportunity for review of the record of the lower court. Our order was based in part on the fact that a substantial and dangerous health, safety, and fire hazard existed in the City of Detroit because of the uncollected refuse.

The grant or denial of a temporary injunction by a trial court is discretionary. Hiers v. Detroit Superintendent of Schools (1965), 376 Mich 225. Appellate relief from the grant or denial of a temporary injunction requires a showing of probable abuse of discretion by the trial court. After a review of the record, oral argument, and due deliberation, we hold that no such showing is demonstrated here.

Temporary injunction dissolved and appeal dismissed. No costs, a public question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff appeals the lower court refusal to issue an order directing defendant employees to work overtime. This Court issued a temporary restraining order directing defendants, sanitation workers in the employ of the City of Detroit, from engaging in any work stoppage or refusing to work overtime hours as ordered by the city, pending a full hearing by this Court and an opportunity for review of the record of the lower court. Our order was based in part on the fact that a substantial and dangerous health, safety, and fire hazard existed in the City of Detroit because of the uncollected refuse.

The grant or denial of a temporary injunction by a trial court is discretionary. Hiers v. Detroit Superintendent of Schools (1965), 376 Mich 225. Appellate relief from the grant or denial of a temporary injunction requires a showing of probable abuse of discretion by the trial court. After a review of the record, oral argument, and due deliberation, we hold that no such showing is demonstrated here.

Temporary injunction dissolved and appeal dismissed. No costs, a public question.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 N.W.2d 700, 34 Mich. App. 159, 79 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2045, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1592, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-detroit-pub-works-dept-v-local-77-afscme-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack