City of Crystal River v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters
This text of 884 So. 2d 440 (City of Crystal River v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We conclude that under the facts of this case the trial court correctly concluded that the issue of whether arbitration was demanded in a timely fashion should properly be before the arbitrator for determination. See Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 537 U.S. 79, 123 S.Ct. 588, 154 L.Ed.2d 491 (2002); Piercy v. School Board of Washington County, 576 So.2d 806 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991); Graham Contracting, Inc. v. Flagler County, 444 So.2d [441]*441971 (Fla. 5th DCA), review denied, 451 So.2d 848 (Fla.1984); Rinker Portland Cement Corp. v. Seidel, 414 So.2d 629 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Public Health Trust of Dade Co. v. M.R. Harrison Constr. Corp., 415 So.2d 756 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), review denied, 427 So.2d 737 (Fla.1983).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
884 So. 2d 440, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 14446, 2004 WL 2191245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-crystal-river-v-united-brotherhood-of-carpenters-fladistctapp-2004.