Home/Court of Appeals of Texas/City of Comanche v. Brightman

City of Comanche v. Brightman

92 S.W.2d 460, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 203
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in City of Comanche v. Brightman. Read the opinion of the Court — 88 S.W.2d 741 →
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1936·No. No. 1263 — 1589.·Published

Opinion

This day came on to be heard appellant's motion to have mandate issued without payment of costs by city, and the same having been duly considered, it appearing to the court that the former order adjudicating costs of appeal in this case against the city of Comanche is void, is hereby granted and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate as prayed for. Republic Insurance Company v. Highland Park Independent School District (Tex.Civ.App.) 57 S.W.2d 627 (Error Refused); Grant et al. v. Ellis (Tex.Com.App.) 50 S.W.2d 1093; and Duclos v. Harris County (Tex.Com.App.) 298 S.W. 417. *Page 461

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Comanche v. Brightman, 92 S.W.2d 460, 1936 Tex. App. LEXIS 203 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

92 S.W.2d 460 (City of Comanche v. Brightman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Republic Ins. Co. v. Highland Park Independent School Dist. of Dallas County
57 S.W.2d 627 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1933)
Duclos v. Harris County
298 S.W. 417 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)
Grant v. Ellis
50 S.W.2d 1093 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)