City of Comanche v. Brightman

Court of Appeals of Texas

City of Comanche v. Brightman

92 S.W.2d 460

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 27, 1936·No. No. 1263-1589·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This day came on to be heard appellant’s motion to have mandate issued .without payment of costs by city, and the same having been duly considered, it appearing to the court that the former order adjudicating costs of appeal in this case against the city of Comanche is void, is hereby granted and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate as prayed for. Republic Insurance Company v. Highland Park Independent School District (Tex.Civ.App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 627 (Error Refused); Grant et al. v. Ellis (Tex.Com.App.) 50 S.W.(2d) 1093; and Duelos v. Harris County (Tex.Com.App.) 298 S.W. 417.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This day came on to be heard appellant’s motion to have mandate issued .without payment of costs by city, and the same having been duly considered, it appearing to the court that the former order adjudicating costs of appeal in this case against the city of Comanche is void, is hereby granted and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate as prayed for. Republic Insurance Company v. Highland Park Independent School District (Tex.Civ.App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 627 (Error Refused); Grant et al. v. Ellis (Tex.Com.App.) 50 S.W.(2d) 1093; and Duelos v. Harris County (Tex.Com.App.) 298 S.W. 417.

City of Comanche v. Brightman, 92 S.W.2d 460 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

92 S.W.2d 460 (City of Comanche v. Brightman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related