City of Comanche v. Brightman

92 S.W.2d 460
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 27, 1936
DocketNo. 1263-1589
StatusPublished

This text of 92 S.W.2d 460 (City of Comanche v. Brightman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Comanche v. Brightman, 92 S.W.2d 460 (Tex. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This day came on to be heard appellant’s motion to have mandate issued .without payment of costs by city, and the same having been duly considered, it appearing to the court that the former order adjudicating costs of appeal in this case against the city of Comanche is void, is hereby granted and the clerk is directed to issue the mandate as prayed for. Republic Insurance Company v. Highland Park Independent School District (Tex.Civ.App.) 57 S.W.(2d) 627 (Error Refused); Grant et al. v. Ellis (Tex.Com.App.) 50 S.W.(2d) 1093; and Duelos v. Harris County (Tex.Com.App.) 298 S.W. 417.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Duclos v. Harris County
298 S.W. 417 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1927)
Grant v. Ellis
50 S.W.2d 1093 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
92 S.W.2d 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-comanche-v-brightman-texapp-1936.