Home/Ohio Supreme Court/City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission

City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission

103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 79
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 1921
DocketNo. 16562
StatusPublished

This text of 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 79 (City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Columbus v. Public Utilities Commission, 103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 79 (Ohio 1921).

Opinions

It is ordered and adjudged that the order of the public utilities commission be, and the same is hereby, reversed. Four members of the court concur in this judgment. But inasmuch as the judges who concur are not agreed upon the grounds of reversal, no authoritative opinion setting forth the reasons of the judgment is filed in the case. The views of the individual judges may, however, be stated in separate opinions.

Order reversed.

Marshall, C. J., Johnson, Hough and Wanamaker, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
116 U.S. 307 (Supreme Court, 1886)
Walla Walla City v. Walla Walla Water Co.
172 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1898)
United States v. Gleason
175 U.S. 588 (Supreme Court, 1900)
City of Cleveland v. Cleveland City Railway Co.
194 U.S. 517 (Supreme Court, 1904)
Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles
211 U.S. 265 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. Railroad Commission
238 U.S. 174 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Carnegie Steel Co. v. United States
240 U.S. 156 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co. v. Reynolds
244 U.S. 574 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Day v. United States
245 U.S. 159 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Union Dry Goods Co. v. Georgia Public Service Corp.
248 U.S. 372 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Columbus Railway, Power & Light Co. v. City of Columbus
249 U.S. 399 (Supreme Court, 1919)
City of Pawhuska v. Pawhuska Oil & Gas Co.
250 U.S. 394 (Supreme Court, 1919)
City of Winchester v. Winchester Water Works Co.
251 U.S. 192 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Producers Transportation Co. v. Railroad Commission
251 U.S. 228 (Supreme Court, 1920)
Yeatman v. Public Service Com.
95 A. 158 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1915)
Charles Simons Sons Co. v. Maryland Telephone & Telegraph Co.
57 A. 193 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1904)
Matter of Quinby v. . Public Service Comm.
119 N.E. 433 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Rochester Telephone Co. v. . Ross
88 N.E. 793 (New York Court of Appeals, 1909)
Trustees of the Village of Saratoga Springs v. Saratoga Gas, Electric Light & Power Co.
83 N.E. 693 (New York Court of Appeals, 1908)
People Ex Rel. Village of South Glens Falls v. Public Service Commission
121 N.E. 777 (New York Court of Appeals, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 Ohio St. (N.S.) 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-columbus-v-public-utilities-commission-ohio-1921.