City of Clearlake v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedSeptember 21, 2020
Docket1:20-cv-06212
StatusUnknown

This text of City of Clearlake v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation (City of Clearlake v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Clearlake v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

Sep 21 2020 SUSAN Y. SOONG UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT on NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFOR MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION SAN FRANCISCO

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION MDL No. 2804

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —173)

On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 290 F.Supp.3d 1375 JJ.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 2,058 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Pollster. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Polster. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. aie lh CBA EBACE On John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel

| hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio By: /s/Robert Pitts SE Deputy Clerk cs SIC AS

SCHEDULE CTO-173 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA SOUTHERN

MLS 1 2099428 ALS + 20—-00443 Peareh Band of Creek edians-+-Cardinat Heath □□□□ Opposed 9/16/2 CALIFORNIA NORTHERN

CAN 1 40-0622 oy of Clearlake et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug orporation et al MISSOURI EASTERN MOE 4 29-91404 Dekalb County AHerean PLC eta Opposed 9/17/202 MOE 4 20-OH9S Grundy County-vAdergan PEC etal OG nosed 9/17/202(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.
290 F. Supp. 3d 1375 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
City of Clearlake v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-clearlake-v-amerisourcebergen-drug-corporation-cand-2020.