City of Chico v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedMay 14, 2020
Docket2:20-cv-00876
StatusUnknown

This text of City of Chico v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation (City of Chico v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
City of Chico v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

WQO00 42.4 UV VYUOTUUINGVIVE DIVING PYVUULPIOCLIL O PUM Vi attcoyv Prayer it Via

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on FILED MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION Mey “4 2020

IN RE: NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE LITIGATION MDL No. 2804

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —151)

On December 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 62 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 290 F.Supp.3d 1375 J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, 2,010 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of Ohio. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Pollster. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of Ohio and assigned to Judge Polster. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of Ohio for the reasons stated in the order of December 5, 2017, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Dan A. Polster. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL: ioaennckas* Gb po BA_

eee Clerk of the Panel

| hereby certify that this instrument is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. Attest: Sandy Opacich, Clerk U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio EO, By: /s/Robert Pitts Os 2% Deputy Clerk

2.42U UV VVO PING LIVIN bMYVVULLTICII O PHM Vai boo Payee ¢e¢vic

SCHEDULE CTO-151 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ALABAMA SOUTHERN

EEC -etat Opposed 5/12/2020 CALIFORNIA EASTERN

_ City of Chico et al v. Amerisourcebergen Drug CAE 2 20-00876 Corporation et al FLORIDA MIDDLE

‘ The City of Orlande-Florida- +-CVS Health € etet Opposed 5/6/2020 KANSAS KS 5 ag-94g22 Shawhee County, Kansas, Boarc of Commissioners AHersen PEE ett Opposed 5/12/2020

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Nat'l Prescription Opiate Litig.
290 F. Supp. 3d 1375 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2017)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
City of Chico v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/city-of-chico-v-amerisourcebergen-drug-corporation-caed-2020.