City of Chicago v. Bah
241 N.E.2d 640, 101 Ill. App. 2d 17
Opinion
City of Chicago, a Municipal Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Edward Bah and Helen Bah, a/k/a Edward Bak and Helen Bak, Defendants-Appellees.
Illinois Appellate Court First District, Third Division.
Raymond F. Simon, Corporation Counsel, of Chicago, by Edmund Hatfield (Marvin E. Aspen, Edmund Hatfield, Assistant Corporation Counsel, of counsel), for appellant.
Arvey, Hodes & Mantynband, Jerome T. Burke, and Richard J. Troy, of Chicago, for appellee.
(Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion by JUSTICE SCHWARTZ.
Motion allowed.
Not to be published in full.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
City of Chicago v. Bah, 241 N.E.2d 640, 101 Ill. App. 2d 17 (Ill. Ct. App. 1968).
241 N.E.2d 640 (City of Chicago v. Bah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Sullivan v. Bach
427 N.E.2d 645 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1981)
LaMotte v. Constantine
416 N.E.2d 23 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1980)
Mason v. Freeman National Printing Equipment Co.
366 N.E.2d 1015 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)
Stone & Adler, Inc. v. Cooper
315 N.E.2d 56 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1974)