City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co.

809 N.E.2d 666, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1228
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 16, 2004·No. No. 2002-1678·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinions

{¶ 1} The cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently accepted.

Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor and O’Donnell, JJ., concur. F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co., 809 N.E.2d 666, 102 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (Ohio 2004).

809 N.E.2d 666 (City of Akron v. Holland Oil Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Church of the Open Door
902 N.E.2d 1002 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Whelan v. Vanderwist of Cincinnati, Inc., 2007-G-2769 (5-2-2008)
2008 Ohio 2135 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2008)
Jevack v. McNaughton, 06ca008928 (5-21-2007)
2007 Ohio 2441 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Hicks v. Allen, Unpublished Decision (2-16-2007)
2007 Ohio 693 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)
Hale v. Spitzer Dodge, Inc., Unpublished Decision (6-29-2006)
2006 Ohio 3309 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Wrinkle v. Cotton, Unpublished Decision (8-18-2004)
2004 Ohio 4335 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2004)