Citizens & Southern Bank v. Ponsell

125 S.E. 775, 33 Ga. App. 193, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 814
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 11, 1924
Docket15790
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 125 S.E. 775 (Citizens & Southern Bank v. Ponsell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citizens & Southern Bank v. Ponsell, 125 S.E. 775, 33 Ga. App. 193, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 814 (Ga. Ct. App. 1924).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The petition of Mrs. D. B. Ponsell against the Citizens and Southern Bank is substantially as follows: On May 7, 1920, Mrs. Ponsell deposited $1500 to her credit in the defendant bank. From May 8 to May 26, 1920, the bank paid out her entire deposit on forged checks. She received no notice of the status of her account, and knew nothing of it, “until, by the merest accident,” in or about the latter part of August or the first part of September, 1920, she discovered for the first time, “while looking through some old papers,” the statement of her account with the bank, together with the checks. “To her counsel only did she [194]*194make known the fact of such forged checks against her said account some two or three months ago.” (The petition was filed September 26, 1923.) The reason she did not immediately notify the bank of such forgeries after the discovery of said checks in the latter part of August or the first part of September, 1920, was that her husband, who had forged the checks to pay his individual indebtedness, was continuously drunk, and had repeatedly threatened her life and the lives of her children, and she was afraid that he would carry out his threats if she exposed his forgeries. Only after the husband had abandoned her did she think of making demand for her money. On September 6, 1923, she personally demanded her said deposit, and the defendant refused payment. Plaintiff never cheeked against her account, nor did she ever authorize any one else to sign her name to any cheek, draft, or order for the payment of money out of her account. JETeld: The demurrer to the petition was properly overruled.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Bloodworlh, J., concur. Luke, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bank of Thomas County v. Dekle
168 S.E.2d 834 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)
Indemnity Insurance Company of North America v. Fulton National Bank
133 S.E.2d 43 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1963)
G. Franklyn Fischer & Associates, Inc. v. First National Bank
116 S.E.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1960)
Cesaroni v. Savannah Bank & Trust Co.
82 S.E.2d 172 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1954)
White v. Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co.
30 S.E.2d 118 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1944)
Ponsell v. Citizens & Southern Bank
133 S.E. 351 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 S.E. 775, 33 Ga. App. 193, 1924 Ga. App. LEXIS 814, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-southern-bank-v-ponsell-gactapp-1924.