Citizens Independent Telephone Co. v. Davis

97 N.E.2d 490, 229 Ind. 217
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 1, 1951
DocketAppellate Court No. 18,036
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 97 N.E.2d 490 (Citizens Independent Telephone Co. v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Citizens Independent Telephone Co. v. Davis, 97 N.E.2d 490, 229 Ind. 217 (Ind. 1951).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

has not been the general practice of this court to deny a petition to transfer with an opinion, although it is proper to do so. See In Re Petitions to Transfer Appeals (1930), 202 Ind. 365, 174 N. E. 812; Hunter v. C. C. C. & St. L. R. Co. (1930), 202 Ind. 328, 174 N. E. 287; Myers v. Newcomer (1930), 202 Ind. 335, 174 N. E. 290; Sluss v. Thermoid Rubber Co. (1930), 202 Ind. 338, 174 N. E. 291; Burkus v. State (1931), 202 Ind. 341, 174 N. E. 292; Heffner v. White (1943), 221 Ind. 315, 47 N. E. 2d 964. When a transfer is denied, it does not necessarily follow that the result, or the reasoning by which the result is reached by the Appellate Court, is thereby approved by this court, since the petition to transfer may not present such matters for our determination. The petition to transfer in this case in general (1) challenges the sufficiency of the evidence before the Industrial Board which granted an *219 award for death caused by lightning, and (2) contends the Appellate Court erroneously determined that death was caused by the employment.

We do not believe that the appellant’s contentions on the subject of causation require us to transfer the cause. However, by our refusal to transfer we are not deciding that the Appellate Court’s statements on causation, or its analysis of the reasoning in E. I. Du Pont, etc. v. Lilly (1948), 226 Ind. 267, 79 N. E. 2d 387, are correct. The petition to transfer does not require the reexamination of either Deckard v. Trustees of Indiana, University (1931), 92 Ind. App. 192, 172 N. E. 547, or the Du Pont case, supra.

There was ample evidence before the Industrial Board to sustain the award. Therefore the transfer is denied.

Draper, J., not participating.

Note.—Reported in 97 N. E. 2d 491.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. State
725 N.E.2d 441 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 2000)
K-Mart Corp. v. Novak
521 N.E.2d 1346 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1988)
Snyder, Admx. v. Mouser
272 N.E.2d 627 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1971)
State Ex Rel. Harris v. Superior Court
197 N.E.2d 634 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1964)
Jasper & Chicago Motor Express, Inc. v. Ziffrin Truck Lines, Inc.
172 N.E.2d 586 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1961)
United States Steel Corp. v. Dykes
154 N.E.2d 111 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1958)
Noble, Etc. v. Zimmerman
146 N.E.2d 828 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1957)
Highshew v. Kushto
134 N.E.2d 555 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1956)
In the Matter of Carey v. Schroeder Mining Company
283 P.2d 1005 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1955)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
97 N.E.2d 490, 229 Ind. 217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/citizens-independent-telephone-co-v-davis-ind-1951.