Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. Smrha
This text of 293 P.2d 241 (Cities of Hesston & Sedgwick v. Smrha) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
CITIES OF HESSTON AND SEDGWICK, and HARVEY HENSLEY, CITIES OF BURRTON AND HALSTEAD, and THE CITY OF NEWTON, KANSAS, Appellees,
v.
R.V. SMRHA, Chief Engineer, Division of Water Resources, Kansas State Board of Agriculture, Topeka, Kansas, and THE CITY OF WICHITA, KANSAS, Appellants.
Supreme Court of Kansas.
Warden L. Noe, special assistant attorney general, and William P. Timmerman, of Wichita, argued the cause, and Harold R. Fatzer, attorney general, Paul Wilson, assistant attorney general, Fred W. Aley, city attorney, Robert B. Morton, assistant city attorney, Edward F. Arn, and Richard F. Mullins, all of Wichita, were with them on the briefs for the appellants.
Kenneth G. Speir and J.G. Somers, both of Newton, argued the cause, and Vernon A. Stroberg, Herbert H. Sizemore, and Richard F. Hrdlicka, all of Newton, were with them on the briefs for the appellees.
The opinion of the court was delivered by
ROBB, J.:
This appeal is dismissed in accordance with the opinion and views expressed in City of McPherson v. Smrha, No. 39,873, this day decided.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
293 P.2d 241, 179 Kan. 72, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cities-of-hesston-sedgwick-v-smrha-kan-1956.