Cinotti v. Davidsohn
This text of 283 A.D.2d 280 (Cinotti v. Davidsohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered October 11, 2000, which, insofar as appealed from, denied petitioner’s application to enjoin respondents from acting or [281]*281holding themselves out as officers, directors, employees or representatives of the subject corporation, and to declare petitioner and two others as the duly elected directors of the corporation, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Under the corporation’s bylaws, petitioner could not act both personally and by proxy at the meeting where he was elected. Thus, the proxy used by petitioner as a device for his nomination to the board was invalid, and the ensuing election a nullity. Nor does Business Corporation Law § 619 require that the court order a new election. Petitioner’s conclusory allegations that respondents might enter into agreements detrimental to the corporation’s interests do not address the merits of petitioner’s claim to control of the corporation, and otherwise do not warrant the injunctive relief he seeks. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Tom, Mazzarelli, Wallach and Friedman, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
283 A.D.2d 280, 724 N.Y.S.2d 312, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5053, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cinotti-v-davidsohn-nyappdiv-2001.