Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision

2002 Ohio 6297, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 4, 2002·No. 2002-0961·Published

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 97 Ohio St.3d 1219.]

CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CLERMONT COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES.

[Cite as Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002-Ohio-6297.]

Joint motion to remand sustained. (No. 2002-0961—Submitted November 13, 2002—Decided December 4, 2002.)

APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 98-K-707 and 98-K-708.

{¶1} This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to remand,

{¶2} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the joint motion to remand be, and hereby is, sustained. We acknowledge that, under Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 96 Ohio St.3d 165, 2002-Ohio-4033, 772 N.E.2d 1160, the appeal may have been filed before the start of the running of the appeal time set forth in R.C. 5717.01. Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the settlement of the parties, this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with directions to remand this cause to the Clermont County Board of Revision to implement the mediated agreement of the parties.

{¶3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear their respective costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax Appeals to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.

MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.

COOK, J., concurs in judgment.

SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Raymond D. Anderson and Scott J. Ziance; Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue and Todd S. Swatsler; and Julie L. Ezell, for appellant.

Donald A. White, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Allan Lee Edwards, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Clermont County Board of Revision and Clermont County Auditor.

Wood & Lamping, L.L.P., and David C. DiMuzio, for appellees New Richmond Exempted Village Board of Education and U.S. Grant Vocational School District Board of Education.

Strauss & Troy, L.P.A., and Franklin A. Klaine, for appellee city of Moscow.

Alan C. Motta, for appellee Washington Township Board of Trustees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2002 Ohio 6297, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219 (Ohio 2002).

2002 Ohio 6297 (Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision
2002 Ohio 4033 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)