Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Clermont County Board of Revision

778 N.E.2d 1046, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 4, 2002
DocketNo. 2002-0961
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 778 N.E.2d 1046 (Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Clermont County Board of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Clermont County Board of Revision, 778 N.E.2d 1046, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219 (Ohio 2002).

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Board of Tax Appeals. Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion to remand,

2} IT IS ORDERED by the court that the joint motion to remand be, and hereby is, sustained. We acknowledge that, under Cleveland Elec. Illum. Co. v. Lake Cty. Bd. of Revision, 96 Ohio St.3d 165, 2002-Ohio-4033, 772 N.E.2d 1160, the appeal may have been filed before the start of the running of the appeal time set forth in R.C. 5717.01. Nevertheless, in the interests of justice and to facilitate the settlement of the parties, this cause is remanded to the Board of Tax Appeals with directions to remand this cause to the Clermont County Board of Revision to implement .the mediated agreement of the parties.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, L.L.P., Raymond D. Anderson and Scott J. Ziance; Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue and Todd S. Swatsler; and Julie L. Ezell, for appellant. Donald A. White, Clermont County Prosecuting Attorney, and Allan Lee Edwards, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellees Clermont County Board of Revision and Clermont County Auditor. Wood & Lamping, L.L.P., and David C. DiMuzio, for appellees New Richmond Exempted Village Board of Education and U.S. Grant Vocational School District Board of Education. Strauss & Troy, L.P.A., and Franklin A. Klaine, for appellee city of Moscow. Alan C. Motta, for appellee Washington Township Board of Trustees.

{¶ 3} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to bear their respective costs herein expended, that a mandate be sent to the Board of Tax Appeals to carry this judgment into execution, and that a copy of this entry be certified to the Board of Tax Appeals for entry.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Cook, J., concurs in judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Gas & Elec. Co. v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Revision
2002 Ohio 6297 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
778 N.E.2d 1046, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-gas-electric-co-v-clermont-county-board-of-revision-ohio-2002.