Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wiest

98 N.E.3d 287, 2018 Ohio 187, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1269
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 19, 2018·No. No. 2016–0263·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*1269{¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Christopher David Wiest, Attorney Registration No. 0077931, last known address in Fort Mitchell, Kentucky.

{¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of December 19, 2016, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(12)(A)(3), suspended respondent from the practice of law for a period of two years, with the second year stayed on the condition that he engage in no further misconduct, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(24).

*1270{¶ 3} Therefore, it is ordered by this court that respondent is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

{¶ 4} It is further ordered that the clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(1) and that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(17)(D)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wiest, 98 N.E.3d 287, 2018 Ohio 187, 152 Ohio St. 3d 1269 (Ohio 2018).

98 N.E.3d 287 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Wiest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Wiest
2018 Ohio 187 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2018)