Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

595 N.E.2d 941, 64 Ohio St. 3d 1206, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1947

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 13, 1992

DocketNo. 91-1250

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 595 N.E.2d 941 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz, 595 N.E.2d 941, 64 Ohio St. 3d 1206, 1992 Ohio LEXIS 1947 (Ohio 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

On Application for Reinstatement.

This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent, Gregory G. Spitz, Attorney Registration No. 0000794.

[1207]*1207The court coining now to consider its order of December 11, 1991, suspending respondent, Gregory G. Spitz, from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(7)(c), now Section (6)(B), finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10) (formerly Section 24).

Therefore, IT IS ORDERED by the court that Gregory G. Spitz be, and hereby is, reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent comply with the registration requirements of Gov.Bar R. VI.

For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Spitz (1991), 62 Ohio St.3d 178, 580 N.E.2d 1071.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI