Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz

580 N.E.2d 1071, 62 Ohio St. 3d 178, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2868
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 11, 1991
DocketNo. 91-1250
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 580 N.E.2d 1071 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz, 580 N.E.2d 1071, 62 Ohio St. 3d 178, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2868 (Ohio 1991).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings of respondent’s violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recom[180]*180mended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. We thus suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, with reinstatement conditioned upon repayment of the retainer fees tendered to him by his clients. Costs taxed to the respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright and Resnick, JJ., concur. H. Brown, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Spitz
2000 Ohio 122 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
580 N.E.2d 1071, 62 Ohio St. 3d 178, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-spitz-ohio-1991.