Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz
This text of 580 N.E.2d 1071 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Spitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
After careful consideration of the record before us, we concur in the board’s findings of respondent’s violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility. We decline, however, to adopt the board’s recom[180]*180mended sanction, finding that respondent’s misconduct warrants a more severe penalty. We thus suspend respondent from the practice of law in Ohio for a period of six months, with reinstatement conditioned upon repayment of the retainer fees tendered to him by his clients. Costs taxed to the respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
580 N.E.2d 1071, 62 Ohio St. 3d 178, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 2868, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-spitz-ohio-1991.