Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Mittendorf
This text of 447 N.E.2d 103 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Mittendorf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Upon review of the board’s findings of fact and recommendation in the instant action, we find our decision last term in Columbus Bar Assn. v. Wolfe (1982), 70 Ohio St. 2d 55 [24 O.O.3d 113], controlling herein. In Wolfe, this court held that a one-year suspension was the appropriate disciplinary penalty for an attorney who, under pronounced emotional and [125]*125physical stress, willfully failed to file an income tax return where such failure did not, however, adversely affect his clients. We find no reason to depart from so recent a decision, reached by delicately balancing the interests of the profession, the individual practitioner and society.
Thus, it is hereby ordered that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year.
Judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
447 N.E.2d 103, 4 Ohio St. 3d 123, 4 Ohio B. 369, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 678, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-mittendorf-ohio-1983.