Bar Ass'n v. Litt

449 N.E.2d 429, 5 Ohio St. 3d 98, 5 Ohio B. 178, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 716
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJune 1, 1983
DocketD.D. No. 82-36
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 449 N.E.2d 429 (Bar Ass'n v. Litt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bar Ass'n v. Litt, 449 N.E.2d 429, 5 Ohio St. 3d 98, 5 Ohio B. 178, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 716 (Ohio 1983).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Respondent was found guilty of violating Section 7203, Title 26, U.S. Code. In Columbus Bar Assn. v. Wolfe (1982), 70 Ohio St. 2d 55 [24 O.O.3d 113], Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Mittendorf (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 123, and Ohio State Bar Assn. v. Loha (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 190, lawyers who had violated Section 7203, Title 26, U.S. Code, were suspended from the practice of law for a period of one year. We reaffirm those holdings today.

Accordingly, we order that respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Disciplinary Counsel v. Large
2009 Ohio 2022 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2009)
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Bowen
528 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
449 N.E.2d 429, 5 Ohio St. 3d 98, 5 Ohio B. 178, 1983 Ohio LEXIS 716, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bar-assn-v-litt-ohio-1983.