Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas

Ohio Supreme Court

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas

2000 Ohio 319, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1228

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 2000

Docket1998-0378

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 319 (Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas, 2000 Ohio 319, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1228 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1228.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAAS. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas, 2000-Ohio-319.] (No. 98-378—Submitted and decided January 12, 2000.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Loren Sue Haas, Attorney Registration No. 0001848, last known address in West Chester, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 25, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that the last year of respondent’s two- year suspension be stayed and, further, that respondent, Loren Sue Haas, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 85, 702 N.E.2d 59. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. _________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 88 Ohio St.3d 1228.]

CINCINNATI BAR ASSOCIATION v. HAAS. [Cite as Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas, 2000-Ohio-319.] (No. 98-378—Submitted and decided January 12, 2000.) ON APPLICATION FOR REINSTATEMENT. __________________ {¶ 1} This cause came on for further consideration upon the filing of an application for reinstatement by respondent Loren Sue Haas, Attorney Registration No. 0001848, last known address in West Chester, Ohio. {¶ 2} The court coming now to consider its order of November 25, 1998, wherein the court, pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(6)(B)(3), suspended respondent for a period of two years with one year stayed, finds that respondent has substantially complied with that order and with the provisions of Gov.Bar R. V(10)(A). Therefore, {¶ 3} IT IS ORDERED by this court that the last year of respondent’s two- year suspension be stayed and, further, that respondent, Loren Sue Haas, be and hereby is reinstated to the practice of law in the state of Ohio. {¶ 4} IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of this court issue certified copies of this order as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(1), that publication be made as provided for in Gov.Bar R. V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. {¶ 5} For earlier case, see Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Haas (1998), 84 Ohio St.3d 85, 702 N.E.2d 59. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. _________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 319, 88 Ohio St. 3d 1228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-haas-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack