Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Haas

697 N.E.2d 222, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2168
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 27, 1998
Docket98-378
StatusPublished

This text of 697 N.E.2d 222 (Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Haas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Haas, 697 N.E.2d 222, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2168 (Ohio 1998).

Opinion

Upon consideration of respondent’s motion to supplement record,

IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement record be, and hereby is, granted, and respondent shall file the supplemental documents within seven days of the date of this entry.

Douglas and Resnick, JJ., dissent. Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
697 N.E.2d 222, 82 Ohio St. 3d 1486, 1998 Ohio LEXIS 2168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cincinnati-bar-assn-v-haas-ohio-1998.