Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
396 F.3d 1073, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1642, 2005 WL 237690
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 2, 2005
Docket02-72689
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 396 F.3d 1073 (Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, 396 F.3d 1073, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1642, 2005 WL 237690 (9th Cir. 2005).
Opinions
ORDER
A judge sua sponte called for rehearing en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b). Accordingly, the sua sponte call for rehearing en banc is rejected.
The mandate shall issue in due course.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Avagyan v. Gonzales
216 F. App'x 648 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
396 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
396 F.3d 1073, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1642, 2005 WL 237690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chun-he-li-v-john-ashcroft-attorney-general-ca9-2005.