Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
396 F.3d 1073, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1642, 2005 WL 237690
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2005·No. 02-72689·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
ORDER
A judge sua sponte called for rehearing en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35(b). Accordingly, the sua sponte call for rehearing en banc is rejected.
The mandate shall issue in due course.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, 396 F.3d 1073, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1642, 2005 WL 237690 (9th Cir. 2005).
396 F.3d 1073 (Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Avagyan v. Gonzales
216 F. App'x 648 (Ninth Circuit, 2007)
Chun He Li v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General
396 F.3d 1073 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)