Christy v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.
This text of 132 Cal. App. 784 (Christy v. Oakland Title Insurance & Guaranty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal by three of the plaintiffs from portions of the same judgment, unfavorable to them, which we passed upon in the opinion this day filed in Adele F. Christy et al. v. Oakland Title Insurance and Guaranty Co., No. 8604 (ante, p. 315 [22 Pac. (2d) 737]). Since we held in that case that judgment should go for appellant against all of the plaintiffs, the questions presented on this appeal are thereby rendered moot. The appeal herein is accordingly dismissed.
Spence, Acting P. J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.
A petition by respondent to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on July 25, 1933.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
132 Cal. App. 784, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-v-oakland-title-insurance-guaranty-co-calctapp-1933.