Christy v. Minor
This text of 4 Munf. 431 (Christy v. Minor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
the president pronounced the court’s opinion, “ that the deed from Scott to Minor, stated in the bill of exceptions, though proper evidence of a conveyance from the former to the latter, yet was no evidence, without other proof, of the authority of Scott to sell and convey under the several acts of congress recited therein ; and that the judge of the Superior Court erred in his instruction to the jury, that it was sufficient evidence ; if such instruction, without separating the law from the fact, would in any case be proper.”
Judgment reversed; verdict set aside; and cause remand? ed for a new trial.
Note. That this instruction was improper, see Fisher’s executor v. Duncan and Turnbull, 1 H. and M. 564.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 Munf. 431, 18 Va. 431, 1815 Va. LEXIS 26, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christy-v-minor-va-1815.