Christopher Wilson v. Los Angeles Police Department

Opinion

l CHRISTOPHER WILSON, CASE NO. LACV21-5617-VBF-SHK an individual; Hon. Valerie B. Fairbank Hon. Shashi H. Kewalramani fPROPOSED} STIPULATED LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, PROTECTIVE ORDER et al The Court, finding good cause, Orders as follows: 1.1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, I the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated ! Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective

Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 1.2 GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT This action involves the City of Los Angeles and members of the Los Angele Police Department. Plaintiff is seeking materials that Defendant the City of Los Angele and Los Angeles Police Department (“City”) maintains as confidential, such as vide g || recordings, audio recordings, and other administrative materials and informatio g || currently in the possession of the City and which the City believes need special protectio from public disclosure and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. The City asserts that the confidentiality of the materials sought by Plaintiff is recognized by California and federal law, as evidenced inter alia by California Penal

Code section 832.7, Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct. for N.D. Cal., 511 F.2d 192, 198

(9th Cir. 1975), aff'd, 426 U.S. 394 (1976), as well as the common law of California, 1s California statutes and certain privileges afforded under Federal common law, including

the “official information,” “deliberative process,” and the “law enforcement investigatory privileges.” See Fed. R. Evid. 501; Cal. Const. Art. 1, §1; Cal. Evid. Code "7 §§ 915, 954, 1012, 1040 and 1043 et seq.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b), 33(b) and 34(b); Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct., 511 F.2d 192, 198 (9th Cir. 1975); Dowling v. American Hawaii Cruises, Inc., 971 F.2d 423, 425, n.1 (9th Cir. 1992); Martinez v. City of ! srockton, 132 F.R.D. 677, 683 (ED. Cal. 1990); Kelly v. City of San Jose, 114 F.R.D. 653, 656-60 (N.D. Cal. 1987); Federal Trade Comm’n v. Warner Comm., Inc., 742 F.2d 11 1156, 1161 (9th Cir. 1984); Jones v. City of Indianapolis, 216 FRD 440, 443-444 (SD 2003). There is also an ongoing criminal investigation and case. As such, requested materials may be protected by the law enforcement investigatory privilege. See United States ex rel. Burroughs v. DeNardi Corp., 167 F.R.D. 680, 687 (S.D.C. 1996); United States v. Winner, 641 F.2d 825, 831 (10% Cir. 1981); Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart \| Shields, Inc., 738 F.2d 1336, 1341 (10 Cir. 1984). Discovery in this case may also

violate third parties’ right to privacy. Johnson by Johnson v. Thompson, 971 F.2d 1487, 1497 (10 Cir. 1992); Stallworth vy. Brollini, 288 F.R.D. 439, 444 (N.D. CA. 2012). The City also contends that the unfettered disclosure of the materials an information, absent a protective order, would allow the media to share this informatio with potential jurors in the area, impacting the rights of the City herein to receive a fai trial. Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt resolutio of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect informatio

the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are permitte reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct of trial

to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It 1s the intent of th parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and tha IS nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of th public record of this case. 2.1 Action: This pending federal law suit, Christopher Wilson v. Los Angeles Police Department, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-05617-VBF-SHK. 2.2 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or items under this Order. 2.3. “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause Statement. 2.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well as their support staff). “Counsel” would also include Plaintiff in pro se. 2.5 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or

items that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated disclosures or responses to discovery 1n this matter. 2.7. Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 2.8 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 2.9 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal entity not named as a Party to this action. 2.10 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 2.11 Party: any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, }employees, consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 2.12 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery Material in this Action. 2.13 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 2.14 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 2.15 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material

from a Producing Party. 2113. SCOPE The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. Any use of Protected Material at trial will be governed by the orders of the trial judge. This Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at trial. i Once a case proceeds to trial, all of the information that was designated as \confidential or maintained pursuant to this protective order becomes public and will be presumptively available to all members of the public, including the press, unless compelling reasons supported by specific factual findings to proceed otherwise are made to the trial judge in advance of the trial. See Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180-81 (9th Cir. 2006) (distinguishing “good cause” showing for sealing documents produced in discovery from “compelling reasons” standard when merits-related documents are part of court record). Accordingly, the terms of this protective order do not extend beyond the commencement of the trial. 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each \|Party or Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral or written communications that qualify so other portions of the material, documents, items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of this Order. Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are

shown to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to junnecessarily encumber the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Designating Party to sanctions. If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is withdrawing the inapplicable designation. 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations. Except as otherwise provided in this Order (see, e.g., second paragraph of section 5.2(a) below), or as otherwise stipulated or ordered, Disclosure or Discovery Material that qualifies for protection under this Order must be clearly so designated before the material is disclosed or produced. Designation in conformity with this Order requires: (a) for information in documentary form (e.g., paper or electronic documents, but excluding transcripts of depositions or other pretrial or trial proceedings), that the Producing Party affix at a minimum, the legend “CONFIDENTIAL” (hereinafter “CONFIDENTIAL legend”), to each page that contains protected material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). A Party or Non-Party that makes original documents available for inspection need designate them for protection until after the inspecting Party has indicated which documents it would like copied and produced. During the inspection and before the \designation, all of the material made available for inspection will be deemed “CONFIDENTIAL.” After the inspecting Party has identified the documents it wants copied and produced, the Producing Party must determine which documents, or portions thereof, qualify for protection under this Order. Then, before producing the specified documents, the Producing Party must affix the “CONFIDENTIAL legend” to each page contains Protected Material. If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, the Producing Party also must clearly identify the protected

portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate markings in the margins). (b) for testimony given in depositions that the Designating Party identify the Disclosure or Discovery Material on the record, before the close of the deposition all protected testimony. 5. (c) for information produced in some form other than documentary and for any other tangible items, that the Producing Party affix in a prominent place on the exterior the container or containers in which the information is stored the legend “CONFIDENTIAL.” If only a portion or portions of the information warrants protection, the Producing Party, to the extent practicable, will identify the protected portion(s). 5.3 Inadvertent Failures to Designate. If timely corrected, an inadvertent failure to designate qualified information or items does not, standing alone, waive the Designating Party’s right to secure protection under this Order for such material. Upon timely correction of a designation, the Receiving Party must make reasonable efforts to \assure that the material is treated in accordance with the provisions of this Order. 6. CHALLENGING CONFIDENTIALITY DESIGNATIONS 6.1 Timing of Challenges. Any Party or Non-Party may challenge a designation of confidentiality at any time that is consistent with the Court’s Scheduling Order. 6.2 Meetand Confer. The Challenging Party will initiate the dispute resolution process (and, if necessary, file a discovery motion) under Local Rule 37.1 et seq. 6.3 The burden of persuasion in any such challenge proceeding will be on the Designating Party. Frivolous challenges, and those made for an improper purpose (e.g., to harass or impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on other parties) may expose the Challenging Party to sanctions. Unless the Designating Party has waived or withdrawn the confidentiality designation, all parties will continue to afford the material in question the level of protection to which it is entitled under the Producing Party’s designation until the Court rules on the challenge.

7. ACCESS TO AND USE OF PROTECTED MATERIAL 7.1 Basic Principles. A Receiving Party may use Protected Material that is disclosed or produced by another Party or by a Non-Party in connection with this Action jonly for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this Action. Such Protected Material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this Order. When the Action has been terminated, a Receiving Party must comply with the provisions of section 13 below (FINAL DISPOSITION). Protected Material must be stored and maintained by a Receiving Party at a location and a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this Order. 7.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the Designating Party, a Receiving Party may disclose any information or item designated “CONFIDENTIAL” only to: (a) the Receiving Party’s Outside Counsel of Record in this Action, as well as employees of said Outside Counsel of Record to whom it is reasonably necessary to } disclose the information for this Action; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including House Counsel) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action; (c) Experts (as defined in this Order) of the Receiving Party to whom disclosure reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the Court and its personnel; (e) court reporters and their staff; (f) professional jury or trial consultants, mock jurors, and Professional Vendors to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this Action and who have signed the ““Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information;

(h) during their depositions, witnesses ,and attorneys for witnesses, in the Action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary provided: (1) the deposing party requests that the witness sign the form attached as Exhibit A hereto; and (2) they will not be permitted to keep any confidential information unless they sign the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the Designating Party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal Protected Material may be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this Stipulated Protective Order; and } (i) any mediator or settlement officer, and their supporting personnel, mutually ;agreed upon by any of the parties engaged in settlement discussions. PROTECTED MATERIAL SUBPOENAED OR ORDERED PRODUCED INOTHER LITIGATION Ifa Party is served with a subpoena or a court order issued in other litigation that compels disclosure of any information or items designated in this Action as “CONFIDENTIAL,” that Party must: (a) promptly notify in writing the Designating Party. Such notification will \include a copy of the subpoena or court order; (b) promptly notify in writing the party who caused the subpoena or order to issue the other litigation that some or all of the material covered by the subpoena or order \is subject to this Protective Order. Such notification will include a copy of this Stipulated Protective Order; and (c) cooperate with respect to all reasonable procedures sought to be pursued by the Designating Party whose Protected Material may be affected. If the Designating Party timely seeks a protective order, the Party served with the subpoena or court order will not produce any information designated in this action as \|“CONFIDENTIAL” before a determination by the court from which the subpoena or order issued, unless the Party has obtained the Designating Party’s permission. The

Designating Party will bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in that court its confidential material and nothing in these provisions should be construed as authorizing or encouraging a Receiving Party in this Action to disobey a lawful directive from another court. 5119. A NON-PARTY’S PROTECTED MATERIAL SOUGHT TO □ BE PRODUCED IN THIS LITIGATION (a) The terms of this Order are applicable to information produced by a Non-Party in this Action and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Such information produced by Non-Parties in connection with this litigation is protected by the remedies and relief provided by this Order. Nothing in these provisions should be construed as prohibiting )a Non-Party from seeking additional protections. (b) In the event that a Party is required, by a valid discovery request, to produce a Non-Party’s confidential information in its possession, and the Party is subject to an agreement with the Non-Party not to produce the Non-Party’s confidential information, then the Party will: (1) promptly notify in writing the Requesting Party and the Non-Party that some or all of the information requested is subject to a confidentiality agreement with a Non- Party; (2) promptly provide the Non-Party with a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order in this Action, the relevant discovery request(s), and a reasonably specific description of the information requested; and (3) make the information requested available for inspection by the Non-Party, if requested. (c) Ifthe Non-Party fails to seek a protective order from this court within 14 days of receiving the notice and accompanying information, the Receiving Party may produce the Non-Party’s confidential information responsive to the discovery request. If the Non-Party timely seeks a protective order, the Receiving Party will not produce any information in its possession or control that is subject to the confidentiality agreement

with the Non-Party before a determination by the court. Absent a court order to the contrary, the Non-Party will bear the burden and expense of seeking protection in this court of its Protected Material. If a Receiving Party learns that, by inadvertence or otherwise, it has disclosed Protected Material to any person or in any circumstance not authorized under this Stipulated Protective Order, the Receiving Party must immediately (a) notify in writing Designating Party of the unauthorized disclosures, (b) use its best efforts to retrieve unauthorized copies of the Protected Material, (c) inform the person or persons to whom unauthorized disclosures were made of all the terms of this Order, and (d) request person or persons to execute the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” that is attached hereto as Exhibit A. INADVERTENT PRODUCTION OF PRIVILEGED OR OTHERWISE PROTECTED MATERIAL When a Producing Party gives notice to Receiving Parties that certain inadvertently produced material is subject to a claim of privilege or other protection, the obligations of the Receiving Parties are those set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5)(B). This provision is not intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order that provides for production without prior privilege review. 12.1 Right to Further Relief. Nothing in this Order abridges the nght of any person to seek its modification by the Court in the future. 12.2 Right to Assert Other Objections. By stipulating to the entry of this Protective Order no Party waives any right it otherwise would have to object to disclosing or producing any information or item on any ground not addressed in this Stipulated Protective Order. Similarly, no Party waives any right to object on any ground to use in evidence of any of the material covered by this Protective Order.

12.3 Filing Protected Material. A Party that seeks to file under seal any Protected Material must comply with Civil Local Rule 79-5. Protected Material may only be filed under seal pursuant to a court order authorizing the sealing of the specific Protected Material at issue. If a Party's request to file Protected Material under seal is denied by the court, then the Receiving Party may file the information in the public record unless otherwise instructed by the court. \|13. FINAL DISPOSITION After the final disposition of this Action, as defined in paragraph 4, within 60 days of a written request by the Designating Party, each Receiving Party must return all Protected Material to the Producing Party or destroy such material. As used in this subdivision, “all Protected Material” includes all copies, abstracts, compilations, summaries, and any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Whether the Protected Material is returned or destroyed, the Receiving Party must submit a written certification to the Producing Party (and, if not the same person or /entity, to the Designating Party) by the 60 day deadline that (1) identifies (by category, where appropriate) all the Protected Material that was returned or destroyed and (2) affirms that the Receiving Party has not retained any copies, abstracts, compilations, /summaries or any other format reproducing or capturing any of the Protected Material. Notwithstanding this provision, Counsel are entitled to retain an archival copy of all pleadings, motion papers, trial, deposition, and hearing transcripts, legal memoranda, correspondence, deposition and trial exhibits, expert reports, attorney work product, and consultant and expert work product, even if such materials contain Protected Material. Any such archival copies that contain or constitute Protected Material remain subject to this Protective Order as set forth in Section 4 (DURATION). 14. Any willful violation of this Order may be punished by civil or criminal contempt proceedings, financial or evidentiary sanctions, reference to disciplinary authorities, or other appropriate action at the discretion of the Court.

IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH PLAINTIFF AND DEFENDANTS’ COUNSEL OF RECORD. loth Dated: November , 2021 Qn LA □□ Christopher Wilson, Plaintiff Dated: November __ 10th, 2021 MICHAEL N. FEUER, City Attorney KATHLEEN A. KENEALY, Chief Deputy City Atty SCOTT MARCUS, Senior Assistant City Attorney CORY M. BRENTE, Senior Assistant City Attorney VY. Bila By: _ ee JAMES V. BILEK, Deputy City Attorney Attorneys for Defendants, CITY OF LOS ANGELES 1s and LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT

11/12/2021 Wes <———— Hon. Shashi H. Kewalramani United States Magistrate Judge

I, _____________________________ [full name], of _____________________ __________________________________________ [full address], declare under penalty of perjury that I have read in its entirety and understand the Stipulated Protective Order that was issued by the United States District Court for the Central District of California on _____________________ [date] in the case of Christopher Wilson v. Los Angeles Police Department., Case No. LACV21-5617-VBF-SHK-cv- 00363-GW-DFM. I agree to comply with and to be bound by all the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order and I understand and acknowledge that failure to so comply could expose me to sanctions and punishment in the nature of contempt. I solemnly promise that I will not disclose in any manner any information or item that is subject to this Stipulated Protective Order to any person or entity except in strict compliance with the provisions of this Order. I further agree to submit to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California for the purpose of enforcing the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order, even if such enforcement proceedings occur after termination of this action. Date: ______________________________________ City and State where signed: _________________________________ Printed name: _______________________________ Signature: __________________________________