Christopher v. State

95 S.W.2d 959

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Christopher v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1936 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 802 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 24, 1936·No. No. 18540·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The matters set forth in the motion for new trial are not such as may be considered in the absence of the statement of facts.

No error has 'been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The matters set forth in the motion for new trial are not such as may be considered in the absence of the statement of facts.

No error has 'been perceived or pointed out.

The judgment is affirmed.

Christopher v. State, 95 S.W.2d 959 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

95 S.W.2d 959 (Christopher v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.