Christopher v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Christopher v. State

95 S.W.2d 959

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedJune 24, 1936

DocketNo. 18541

StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.W.2d 959 (Christopher v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Christopher v. State, 95 S.W.2d 959 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The matters set forth in the motion for new trial are not such as may be considered in the absence of the statement of facts.

No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft of cattle is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The indictment appears regular. The record is before us without statement of facts or bills of exception.

The matters set forth in the motion for new trial are not such as may be considered in the absence of the statement of facts.

No error having been perceived, the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 S.W.2d 959, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.