Christopher James Ryals v. State
This text of Christopher James Ryals v. State (Christopher James Ryals v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered January 17, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00267-CR No. 05-13-00268-CR No. 05-13-00269-CR
CHRISTOPHER JAMES RYALS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F05-18864-U, F12-40687-U, F12-41706-U
ORDER The Court REINSTATES these appeals.
On August 13, 2013, in response to appellant’s motion to extend time to file his brief
complaining about the completeness of the record, this Court ordered the trial court to make
findings regarding the completeness of the record. The Court has received several letters from
court reporter Peri Wood regarding the dates identified. Specifically, she stated that she checked
former court reporter Bridget Barnhill’s notes and found that no hearings were conducted on
November 2, 2005 or January 19, 2006 in the 291st Judicial District Court. She did find that a
plea hearing was recorded on June 20, 2012 and was recorded by court reporter Winnie Lacy and that Ms. Lacy was contacted to prepare the record. Ms. Lacy filed the reporter’s record of the
June 20, 2012 hearing on August 27, 2013.
To date, we have not received the trial court’s findings or the reporter’s record.
Moreover, despite Ms. Wood’s statement about what Ms. Barnhill’s notes show, the trial court’s
docket sheet reflects that in cause no. 05-13-00267-CR, a plea hearing was conducted on
November 2, 2005 and a punishment hearing was conducted on January 19, 2006. The records
of these hearings have not been filed, and the Court cannot determine from the clerk’s record
who recorded the hearings. The appeals cannot proceed until the issue of the reporter’s record is
resolved.
Accordingly, this Court ORDERS the Honorable Jennifer Balido, Presiding Judge of the
291st Judicial District Court, to conduct a hearing to determine the following:
• As to cause no. 05-13-00267-CR, (1) whether hearings were conducted on November 2, 2005 and January 19, 2006; (2) if hearings were conducted on those dates, whether the hearings were recorded; (3) if the hearings were recorded, the name of the court reporter(s) who recorded the hearings; (4) whether the notes are available and can be transcribed; (5) if the notes are available, the date by which the records will be filed; and (6) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for the loss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record.
We ORDER the Honorable Jennifer Balido, Presiding Judge of the 291st Judicial
District Court, to transmit a record of the proceedings, including its written findings of fact,
any orders, and any supporting documentation to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the
date of this order.
We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to the
Honorable Jennifer Balido, Presiding Judge, 291st Judicial District Court; the Court
Coordinator and Chief Clerk of the 291st Judicial District Court; and to counsel for all
parties. We ABATE the appeals to allow the Honorable Jennifer Balido to comply with the
order. The appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the
findings are received.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher James Ryals v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-james-ryals-v-state-texapp-2014.