Christopher James Ryals v. State
This text of Christopher James Ryals v. State (Christopher James Ryals v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered August 13, 2013
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-13-00267-CR No. 05-13-00268-CR No. 05-13-00269-CR
CHRISTOPHER JAMES RYALS, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 291st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F05-18864-U, F12-40687-U, F12-41706-U
ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s August 5, 2013 motion to extend time to file his brief.
In the motion, counsel states the record is not complete. The Court has reviewed the record
before it and determined the following.
In cause no. 05-13-00267-CR, it appears a plea hearing was conducted on November 2, 2005 and a punishment hearing was conducted on January 19, 2006. The records of these hearings have not been filed, and the Court cannot determine from the clerk’s record who recorded the hearings.
In cause no. 05-13-00268-CR, a plea hearing was conducted on June 20, 2012. The docket sheet contained in the clerk’s record reflects that Winnie Lacy recorded the hearing. In all three cases, a hearing was conducted on February 13, 2013. The reporter’s record of this hearing has been filed.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the
following:
As to cause no. 05-13-00267-CR, (1) whether hearings were conducted on November 2, 2005 and January 19, 2006; (2) if hearings were conducted on those dates, whether the hearings were recorded; (3) if the hearings were recorded, the name of the court reporter(s) who recorded the hearings; (4) whether the notes are available and can be transcribed; (5) if the notes are available, the date by which the records will be filed; and (6) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for the loss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record.
As to cause no. 05-13-00268-CR, (1) whether the notes of the June 20, 2012 hearing are available and can be transcribed; (2) if the notes are available, the date by which the record will be filed; and (3) if the notes are not available or cannot be transcribed, whether appellant is at fault for the loss or destruction of the notes and whether the parties can agree on a substituted record.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, including its written
findings of fact, any orders, and any supporting documentation to this Court within THIRTY
DAYS of the date of this order.
We ABATE the appeals to allow the trial court to comply with the order. The appeals
shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are received.
/s/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher James Ryals v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-james-ryals-v-state-texapp-2013.