Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2017 Tex. App. LEXIS 3552
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 20, 2017·No. 01-15-00393-CR·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION FOR EN BANC RECONSIDERATION

Cause number and style: 01-15-00393-CR; Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State of Texas

Date motion filed: May 16, 2017

Party filing motion: Appellant, Christopher Ernest Braughton

A majority of the justices of the Court have voted to deny appellant’s motion for en banc reconsideration. It is ordered that the motion is denied.

Jennings, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration.

Keyes, J., dissenting from the denial of en banc reconsideration for the reasons stated in her dissenting opinion.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown Acting for the En Banc Court*

Date: July 20, 2017

*En banc court consists of Chief Justice Radack and Justices Jennings, Keyes, Higley, Bland, Massengale, Brown, and Lloyd.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2017).

Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State (Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.