Christopher Ernest Braughton v. State

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER ON MOTION Cause number: 01-15-00393-CR Style: Christopher Ernest Braughton v. The State of Texas Date motion filed*: August 17, 2015 Type of motion: Motion to Substitute Counsel Party filing motion: Appellant’s new counsel Niles Illich Document to be filed: N/A

Is appeal accelerated? No.

Ordered that motion is:  Granted  Denied  Dismissed (e.g., want of jurisdiction, moot)  Other: _____________________________________ The motion to substitute counsel is granted, but construed as a notice of appearance as lead counsel, and the Clerk of this Court is directed to note Niles Illich as lead counsel for appellant. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.1(a), 6.2, 6.5(d). If counsel Robert Sirianni requests withdrawal, he must file a motion that complies with Rule 6.5(d). Mr. Sirianni’s objection is overruled as moot.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes  Acting individually

Date: August 27, 2015

November 7, 2008 Revision