Christopher Brady v. State

Opinion

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 29, 2018

No. 04-18-00166-CR

Christopher BRADY,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. NM367258

Honorable Kevin M. O'Connell, Judge Presiding

SHOW CAUSE ORDER

On March 14, 2018, appellant filed a “Motion for Appointment of Counsel on Appeal”

which we may construe as a notice of appeal. See Harkcom v. State, 484 S.W.3d 432, 434 (Tex. Crim. App. 2016). It appears, however, from the documents contained in the clerk’s record that the case has not yet proceeded to trial and judgment.

As a general rule, an appellate court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only after a final judgment of conviction. Workman v. State, 170 Tex. Crim. 621, 343 S.W.2d 446, 447 (1961); Wright v. State, 969 S.W.2d 588, 589 (Tex. App.—Dallas 1998, no pet.); McKown v. State, 915 S.W.2d 160, 161 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 1996, no pet.); Ex parte Culver, 932 S.W.2d 207, 210 (Tex. App.—El Paso 1996, pet ref’d) (appellate courts generally only have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant where there has been a judgment of conviction).

Accordingly, appellant is ORDERED to show cause in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. All other appellate deadlines are SUSPENDED pending our resolution of the jurisdictional issue.

_________________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 29th day of March, 2018.

___________________________________

KEITH E. HOTTLE, Clerk of Court