Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 12, 2019
Docket15-56775
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group (Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group, (9th Cir. 2019).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTOPHER BATTERTON, No. 15-56775 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:14-cv-07667-PJW

DUTRA GROUP, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Filed August 12, 2019

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in The Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 2275 (2019), the opinion of this Court dated January 23, 2018, 880 F.3d 1089, is VACATED and judgment is entered REVERSING the district court’s order denying Dutra’s motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages. We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dutra Group v. Batterton
588 U.S. 358 (Supreme Court, 2019)
Batterton v. Dutra Group
880 F.3d 1089 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-batterton-v-dutra-group-ca9-2019.