Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group
This text of Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group (Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CHRISTOPHER BATTERTON, No. 15-56775 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. v. 2:14-cv-07667-PJW
DUTRA GROUP, Defendant-Appellant. ORDER
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Filed August 12, 2019
Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Chief Judge, and Andrew J. Kleinfeld and Jacqueline H. Nguyen, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
In light of the Supreme Court’s decision in The Dutra Grp. v. Batterton, 139 S. Ct. 2275 (2019), the opinion of this Court dated January 23, 2018, 880 F.3d 1089, is VACATED and judgment is entered REVERSING the district court’s order denying Dutra’s motion to strike the prayer for punitive damages. We remand this case to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christopher Batterton v. Dutra Group, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-batterton-v-dutra-group-ca9-2019.