Christopher Allen Larkin Hill v. Julia Morgan Hill

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 25, 2019
DocketA20D0109
StatusPublished

This text of Christopher Allen Larkin Hill v. Julia Morgan Hill (Christopher Allen Larkin Hill v. Julia Morgan Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Christopher Allen Larkin Hill v. Julia Morgan Hill, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 25, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20D0109. CHRISTOPHER ALLEN LARKIN HILL v. JULIA MORGAN HILL.

In this pending divorce action, Christopher Allen Larkin Hill (“Husband”) seeks discretionary review of the “Order Declaring Defendant A Vexatious Litigant.” We, however, lack jurisdiction. “Generally, an order is final and appealable when it leaves no issues remaining to be resolved, constitutes the court’s final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court.” Thomas v. Douglas Co., 217 Ga. App. 520 (457 SE2d 835) (1995). In this case, the order addresses only the Husband’s ability to continue to file motions in the action and does not constitute a final ruling on the merits of the action. Because the order appealed is not a final order, Husband was required to follow the procedures for interlocutory review as set forth in OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). See generally Miller v. Miller, 282 Ga. 164, 164-165 (646 SE2d 469) (2007) (interlocutory application required to appeal “Final Judgment and Decree of Divorce” in which trial court reserved ruling on parties’ eligibility for certain government benefits). Where both discretionary and interlocutory application procedures apply, the applicant must follow the interlocutory appeal procedure and obtain a timely certificate of immediate review before filing an application. See Miller, 282 Ga. at 164-165; see also OCGA §§ 5-6-34 (b); 5-6-35 (a) (2). Husband’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedures deprives us of jurisdiction over this application, which is hereby DISMISSED. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/25/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Miller
646 S.E.2d 469 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
Thomas v. Douglas County
457 S.E.2d 835 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Christopher Allen Larkin Hill v. Julia Morgan Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christopher-allen-larkin-hill-v-julia-morgan-hill-gactapp-2019.