Christoph Henkel v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltz
This text of Christoph Henkel v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltz (Christoph Henkel v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 01-14-00703-cv FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/24/2015 4:26:15 PM CHRISTOPHER PRINE CLERK
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS NO. 01-14-00703-CV HOUSTON, TEXAS 2/24/2015 4:26:15 PM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CHRISTOPH HENKEL Clerk APPELLANT v.
EMJO INVESTMENTS, LTD. and H.J. VON DER GOLTZ APPELLEES
APPELLEES’ AGREED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE APPELLEES’ BRIEF
Appellees Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. von der Goltz file this Agreed
Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellees’ Brief under the authority of
Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 10.5(b) and would respectfully show the
following:
1. The parties to this appeal are currently engaged in settlement
discussions. In the event of a successful settlement, this appeal would be
dismissed. Accordingly, Appellees and Appellant Christoph Henkel (“Henkel”)
Henkel are in agreement with the request for extension.
2. Appellees seek the 30-day extension of the briefing deadline to allow
the parties the opportunity to attempt to resolve the litigation without further
expense by the parties and the Court.
3. This is an appeal from an order of the 215th Judicial District Court
entered October 21, 2014, denying Henkel’s Special Appearance. 4. Henkel filed his Notice of Appeal on November 10, 2014. Henkel
filed his opening brief on January 5, 2015.
5. Appellees’ brief is due to be filed on or before February 25, 2015.
6. This motion seeks an extension of time of 30 days, up to and
including March 27, 2015.
7. This is Appellees’ second request for an extension to file their brief.
Therefore, Appellees Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. von der Goltz
respectfully request that the Court extend the time for them to file their brief by 30
days, up to and including March 27, 2015.
Respectfully submitted,
ELLISON & KELLER, P.C.
/s/Kelley M. Keller By: Kelley M. Keller State Bar No. 11198240 5120 Woodway, Suite 6019 Houston, Texas 77056 Telephone: 713-266-8200 Facsimile: 713-266-8201 kkeller@ellison-keller.com
Attorneys for Appellants
2 CERTIFICATE OF CONFERENCE
I, Kelley M. Keller, certify that on February 24, 2015, I conferred with counsel for the Appellant regarding settlement discussions in this matter and the briefing schedule in this appeal. Counsel for Appellant is in agreement with the relief sought in this motion.
/s/Kelley M, Keller Kelley M. Keller
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE A true and correct copy of this Appellees’ Agreed Motion for Extension of Time to File Appellees’ Brief has been forwarded to all counsel of record on February 24, 2015, via email and/or eservice as follows:
Asher Griffin Sean Gorman Chris Sileo Jane Langdell Robinson Sean Flammer Jamie Aycock SCOTT, DOUGLASS & MCCONNICO, LLP AHMAD. ZAVITSANOS, ANAIPAKOS, ALAVI & 600 Congress Ave., Ste 1500 MENSING P.C. Austin, Texas 78701-2589 3460 One Houston Center Facsimile: 512-474-0731 1221 McKinney Street agriffin@scottdoug.com Houston. Texas 77010 Facsimile: 713-658-0062 Attorneys for Defendants sgorman@azalaw.com Chalsys Capital Partners, Meliora Energy jrobinson@azalaw.com Technologies, S.a.r.L, and Sonia Lo jamieaycock@azalaw.com
Attorneys for Appellant Christoph Henkel F. Eric Fryar Matthew Buschi Christina Richardson FRYAR LAW FIRM, P.C. 912 Prairie, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77002-3145 Facsimile: 281-605-1888 eric@fryarlawfirm.com
Attorneys for all Intervenors/Plaintiffs
/s/Kelley M. Keller Kelley M. Keller 3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Christoph Henkel v. Emjo Investments, Ltd. and H.J. Von Der Goltz, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/christoph-henkel-v-emjo-investments-ltd-and-hj-von-der-goltz-texapp-2015.