CHRISTISEN v. White

292 S.W.3d 591, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1356, 2009 WL 2949478
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 92682·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Merlin Christisen and Anna Mae Chris-tisen (collectively referred to herein as “plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment of the trial court affirming the decision of the State Tax Commission of Missouri (“tax commission”). Plaintiffs claim the trial court erred in affirming the decision of the tax commission because it was arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, and against the weight of the evidence.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CHRISTISEN v. White, 292 S.W.3d 591, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1356, 2009 WL 2949478 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 591 (CHRISTISEN v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bartley v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER OF SIF
292 S.W.3d 591 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)