Bartley v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER OF SIF

292 S.W.3d 591, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1367
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 15, 2009·No. ED 92681·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

John Bartley (“Claimant”) appeals from the award of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying his claim for workers’ compensation benefits against the Second Injury Fund (“SIF”). The Commission found that there was not a medical causal relationship between his work injury of April 4, 2005, and his condition of ill being in the back and that his employment was a substantial factor causing his complaints, and denied his claim for compensation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bartley v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER OF SIF, 292 S.W.3d 591, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1367 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

292 S.W.3d 591 (Bartley v. MISSOURI STATE TREASURER OF SIF) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

CHRISTISEN v. White
292 S.W.3d 591 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)