Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided October 4, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00619·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 Case No. 1: 24-cv-00619-KES-SAB

10 SCHEDULING ORDER (Fed. R. Civ. P. 16) ALYSSA CHRISTIN,

11 Discovery Deadlines: Plaintiff, Initial Disclosures: September 9, 2024 12 Non-Expert Discovery: April 11, 2025

Expert Disclosure: May 2, 2025 13 Rebuttal Expert Disclosure: May 30, 2025

Expert Discovery: July 11, 2025 14 v. Dispositive Motion Deadlines: 15 Filing: August 29, 2025

Hearing: Pursuant to Local Rules 16

Pre-Trial Conference: 17 February 2, 2026 at 1:30 PM WAL-MART ASSOCIATES, INC., Courtroom 6 18 Defendant. Trial: March 31, 2026 at 09:00 AM 19 Courtroom 6 Jury Trial - 3-7 Days 20

22 23 I. Date of Scheduling Conference 24 The Scheduling Conference was held on October 3, 2024. 25 II. Appearances of Counsel 26 Catharine McGlynn appeared by video on behalf of Plaintiff. 27 Komal Jain appeared by video on behalf of Defendant. 28 1 III. Consent to Magistrate Judge 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), to the parties who have not consented to conduct all further 3 proceedings in this case, including trial, before United States Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone, 4 you should be informed that because of the pressing workload of United States district judges and 5 the priority of criminal cases under the United States Constitution, you may consent to magistrate 6 judge jurisdiction in an effort to have your case adjudicated in a timely and cost effective manner. 7 The parties are advised that they are free to withhold consent or decline magistrate jurisdiction 8 without adverse substantive consequences. 9 IV. Initial Disclosure under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) 10 Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) have been completed. 11 V. Amendments to Pleading 12 The parties do not anticipate any amendments to the pleadings at this time. The parties are 13 advised that filing motions and/or stipulations requesting leave to amend the pleadings does not 14 reflect on the propriety of the amendment or imply good cause to modify the existing schedule, if 15 necessary. All proposed amendments must (A) be supported by good cause pursuant to Fed. R. 16 Civ. P. 16(b) if the amendment requires any modification to the existing schedule, see Johnson v. 17 Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th Cir. 1992), and (B) establish, under Fed. R. 18 Civ. P. 15(a), that such an amendment is not (1) prejudicial to the opposing party, (2) the product 19 of undue delay, (3) proposed in bad faith, or (4) futile, see Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 20 (1962). 21 VI. Discovery Plan and Cut-Off Dates 22 The parties are ordered to complete all non-expert discovery on or before April 11, 2025 23 and all expert discovery on or before July 11, 2025. 24 The parties are directed to disclose all expert witnesses, in writing, on or before May 2, 25 2025 and to disclose all rebuttal experts on or before May 30, 2025. The written designation of 26 retained and non-retained experts shall be made pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2), (A), (B) 27 and (C) and shall include all information required thereunder. Failure to designate experts in 28 compliance with this order may result in the Court excluding the testimony or other evidence 1 offered through the experts that are not properly disclosed in compliance with this order. 2 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(4) and (5) shall apply to all discovery relating to 3 experts and their opinions. Experts must be fully prepared to be examined on all subjects and 4 opinions included in the designation. Failure to comply will result in the imposition of sanctions, 5 which may include striking the expert designation and the exclusion of their testimony. 6 The provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e) regarding a party's duty to timely supplement 7 disclosures and responses to discovery requests will be strictly enforced. 8 The parties are cautioned that the discovery/expert cut-off deadlines are the dates by which 9 all discovery must be completed. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be heard after the 10 discovery deadlines. Moreover, absent good cause, the Court will only grant relief on a discovery 11 motion if the relief requested requires the parties to act before the expiration of the relevant 12 discovery deadline. In other words, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served 13 sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadlines to permit time for a response, time to meet and 14 confer, time to prepare, file and hear a motion to compel and time to obtain relief on a motion to 15 compel. Counsel are expected to take these contingencies into account when proposing discovery 16 deadlines. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel be filed and heard 17 sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant effective relief within 18 the allotted discovery time. A party's failure to have a discovery dispute heard sufficiently in 19 advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 20 VII. Pre-Trial Motion Schedule 21 Unless prior leave of Court is obtained at least seven (7) days before the filing date, all 22 moving and opposition briefs or legal memorandum in civil cases shall not exceed twenty-five (25) 23 pages. Reply briefs filed by moving parties shall not exceed ten (10) pages. Before scheduling any 24 motion, the parties must comply with all requirements set forth in Local Rule 230 and 251. 25 A. Non-Dispositive Pre-Trial Motions 26 As noted, all non-expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be completed no 27 later than April 11, 2025. All expert discovery, including motions to compel, shall be completed 28 no later than July 11, 2025. Compliance with these discovery cutoffs requires motions to compel 1 be filed and heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff so that the Court may grant 2 effective relief within the allotted discovery time. A party’s failure to have a discovery dispute 3 heard sufficiently in advance of the discovery cutoff may result in denial of the motion as untimely. 4 Non-dispositive motions are heard on Wednesdays at 10:00 a.m., before Judge Stanley A. Boone 5 in Courtroom 9. 6 In scheduling any non-dispositive motion, the Magistrate Judge may grant Applications for 7 an Order Shortening Time pursuant to Local Rule 144(e). However, if counsel does not obtain an 8 Order Shortening Time, the Notice of Motion must comply with Local Rule 251. 9 Counsel may appear and argue non-dispositive motions by video, providing a written 10 request to so appear is made to the Magistrate Judge's Courtroom Clerk no later than three (3) court 11 days before the noticed hearing date. In the event that more than one attorney requests to appear 12 by telephone, then it shall be the obligation of the moving party(ies) to arrange and originate a 13 conference call to the court. 14 Discovery Disputes: If a motion is brought under Fed. R. Civ. P.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Foman v. Davis
371 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1962)