Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided September 9, 2024·No. 1:24-cv-00619·Unknown

Opinion

ALYSSA CHRISTIN, Case No.: 1:24-cv-00619-KES-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED v. PROTECTIVE ORDER

WALMART ASSOCIATES, INC, (ECF No. 7)

Defendant.

) The parties to this action have stipulated to the terms of this Protective Order. / / / / / / I. Purpose Statement A. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(1) and (2), the parties anticipate that due to the nature of Plaintiff’s claims and Defendant’s defenses, discovery will, by definition, include personnel documents, records, confidential company documents, which include proprietary information and potential trade secrets, in addition to potentially third-party personnel information and other personnel information. This information is not otherwise available to the public, and the parties recognize and acknowledge that this information becoming available to the public could, among other things, be extremely valuable to Defendant’s competitors. The parties also anticipate discovery on topics concerning Plaintiff’s background, much of which shares the same confidential characteristics, including detailed medical information, Plaintiff’s generalized background, personal documents, and other information concerning Plaintiff relating to Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants’ defenses. The parties state that the above descriptions are not intended to be an exhaustive list of all classes of information subject to this Stipulated Protective Order. Nothing in this Order shall require any party to produce any specific documents or category of documents which a party deems inappropriate for production. This statement is made in compliance with the requirements set forth in Local Rule 141.1(c)(1) and (2). B. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(c)(3), the parties agree the details set forth below should be entered by court order, rather than as an agreement by and between the parties, because these terms will apply only to the immediate litigation. A protective order entered by the Court will outline procedures for the parties to follow to expeditiously resolve confidentiality and/or privilege disputes – ideally with minimal court involvement. A court order will govern potential discovery from third parties who are non-parties to the immediate litigation and may not otherwise be subject to a private agreement between the parties. C. Pursuant to Local Rule 141.1(a)(1) and Local Rule 141.1(e), the parties further acknowledge, as set forth below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. II. Definitions of Confidential Material A. “Confidential Materials” means any Documents, Testimony or Information designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the provisions of this Stipulated Protective Order. Confidential Material may consist of tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c) (or other applicable federal, state, or foreign data protection laws or other privacy obligations), and materials specified above in the Purpose Statement (Section I). B. Entering into, agreeing to, and/or complying with the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order shall not: 1. operate as an admission by any person that any particular Document, Testimony or Information marked “Confidential” contains or reflects trade secrets, proprietary, confidential or competitively sensitive business, commercial, financial or personal information; or 2. prejudice in any way the right of any Party (or any other person subject to the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order): a. to seek a determination by the Court of whether any particular Confidential Material should be subject to protection as “Confidential” under the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order; or b. to seek relief from the Court on appropriate notice to all other Parties to the Proceeding from any provision(s) of this Stipulated Protective Order, either generally or as to any particular Document, Material or Information. B. Certain information may compel alternative or additional protections beyond those afforded a Confidential Material designation, in which event the parties shall meet and confer in good faith, and, if unsuccessful, shall move the Court for appropriate relief. III. Procedure for Designating Information as Confidential A. To designate information as confidential, the producing party shall mark Confidential Material with the designation, “CONFIDENTIAL.” Parties shall submit confidential discovery responses, such as answers to interrogatories or answers to requests for admissions, in a separate document stamped with the appropriate legend designating those responses as Confidential Material. The Receiving Party may make copies of Confidential Material and such copies shall become subject to the same protections as the Confidential Material from which those copies were made. 1. Information on a disk or other electronic format (e.g., a native format production) may be designated confidential by marking the storage medium itself (or the native file’s title) with the designation, “CONFIDENTIAL.” The Receiving Party shall mark any hard-copy printouts and the storage medium of any permissible copies of such electronic material with the corresponding legend contained on the original and such copies shall become subject to the same protections, as the Confidential Material from which those copies were made. 2. Information disclosed at any deposition of a party taken in this action may be designated by the party as confidential by indicating on the record at the deposition that the information is confidential and subject to the provisions of this Order. Alternatively, the party may designate information disclosed at the deposition as confidential by notifying the court reporter and other parties in writing, within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of the transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript which are designated as confidential. The parties may agree to a reasonable extension of the 15-business-day period for designation. Designations of transcripts will apply to audio, video, or other recordings of the testimony. During such 15-business-day period, the entire transcript shall receive confidential treatment. Upon such designation, the court reporter and each party shall affix the “CONFIDENTIAL.” designation to the designated pages and segregate them as appropriate. B. A producing party may change the confidentiality designation of materials it has produced, as follows: (1) The producing party must give the receiving parties notice of the change by identifying the documents or information at issue. Once notice is given, the receiving party must make good- faith efforts to ensure that the documents or information are accorded treatment under the new designation. (2) Within a reasonable period after giving notice, the producing party must reproduce the documents or information in a format that contains the new designation. (3) If such information has been disclosed to persons not qualified pursuant to Sections VI or VII below, the party who disclosed such information shall (a) take reasonable efforts to retrieve previously disclosed Confidential Material; (b) advise such persons that the material is Confidential; and (c) give the producing party written assurance that steps (a) and (b) have been completed. C. Any Party to the Proceeding (or other person subject to the terms of this Stipulation and Protective Order) may ask the Court, after appropriate notice to the other Parties to the Proceeding, to modify or grant relief from any provision of this Stipulation and Protective Order. IV. Data Security A. The Parties agree to provide adequate security to protect da

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. (Christin v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)