Christiansen v. Young

District Court, D. Arizona·Decided February 16, 2022·No. 2:22-cv-00218·Unknown

Opinion

1 WO MDR 2 3 4 5 8 9 Abel Christiansen, No. CV 22-00218-PHX-JAT (MTM) 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER 12 Dr. Murray Young, et al., 13 Defendants.

14 15 On February 7, 2022, Plaintiff Abel Christiansen, who is confined in the Arizona 16 State Prison Complex-Perryville, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 17 § 1983, an Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or 18 Costs (Doc. 2), a Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 4), and a Motion for Service 19 by U.S. Marshal (Doc. 5). The Court will deny the deficient Application to Proceed, give 20 Plaintiff 30 days to pay the filing and administrative fees or file a complete Application to 21 Proceed In Forma Pauperis, and deny without prejudice the Motions for Appointment of 22 Counsel and Service. 23 I. Payment of Filing Fee 24 When bringing an action, a prisoner must either pay the $350.00 filing fee and a 25 $52.00 administrative fee in a lump sum or, if granted the privilege of proceeding in forma 26 pauperis, pay the $350.00 filing fee incrementally as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 27 An application to proceed in forma pauperis requires an affidavit of indigence and a 28 certified copy of the inmate’s trust account statement for the six months preceding the filing 1 of the Complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). An inmate must submit statements from each 2 institution where he was confined during the six-month period. Id. To assist prisoners in 3 meeting these requirements, the Court requires use of a form application. LRCiv 3.4. 4 If a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court will assess an 5 initial partial filing fee of 20% of either the average monthly deposits or the average 6 monthly balance in Plaintiff’s account, whichever is greater. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). An 7 initial partial filing fee will only be collected when funds exist. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(4). 8 The balance of the $350.00 filing fee will be collected in monthly payments of 20% of the 9 preceding month’s income credited to an inmate’s account, each time the amount in the 10 account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). 11 II. Application Fails to Comply With Statute 12 Plaintiff used the court-approved form for seeking to proceed in forma pauperis 13 when the plaintiff is not a prisoner, not the court-approved form for seeking to proceed in 14 forma pauperis when the plaintiff is a prisoner filing a non-habeas action. Plaintiff, 15 therefore, has not answered the questions on pages one and two of the proper court- 16 approved form, completed the “Acknowledgement of Collection of Filing Fees from Trust 17 Account” section of the form, or obtained the required certification from a prison official. 18 In light of these deficiencies, the Court will deny the Application to Proceed and will give 19 Plaintiff 30 days to either pay the $400.00 filing and administrative fees or file a complete 20 Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis using the form included with this Order. 21 III. Motion for Appointment of Counsel 22 Plaintiff seeks the appointment of counsel, asserting that he is unable to afford 23 counsel, he has made repeated efforts to obtain counsel, and counsel would be better able 24 to present evidence and cross-examine witnesses at trial. He contends imprisonment limits 25 his ability to litigate the complex issues in this case, which require significant research and 26 investigation. Plaintiff also claims he has limited access to a law library and has difficulty 27 understanding information in the law library’s books because he has a lack of legal 28 knowledge and education. 1 There is no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in a civil case. See 2 Ivey v. Bd. of Regents, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir. 1982). In proceedings in forma pauperis, 3 the court may request an attorney to represent any person unable to afford one. 28 U.S.C. 4 § 1915(e)(1). Appointment of counsel under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1) is required only when 5 “exceptional circumstances” are present. Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 6 1991). A determination with respect to exceptional circumstances requires an evaluation 7 of the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of Plaintiff to articulate his 8 claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issue involved. Id. “Neither of these 9 factors is dispositive and both must be viewed together before reaching a decision.” Id. 10 (quoting Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986)). 11 Having considered both elements, it does not appear at this time that exceptional 12 circumstances are present that would require the appointment of counsel in this case. 13 Plaintiff is in no different position than many pro se prisoner litigants. Thus, the Court will 14 deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel. 15 IV. Motion for Service 16 The Court will deny without prejudice Plaintiff’s premature request for service by 17 the United States Marshal. If Plaintiff either pays the filing and administrative fees or files 18 a complete Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, the Court will screen Plaintiff’s 19 Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. If the Court determines an answer is required, 20 the Court will direct the Clerk of Court to send Plaintiff a service packet containing 21 summons and request for waiver forms for Plaintiff to complete and return to the Court. If 22 Plaintiff returns the service packet to the Court, the Court will direct the United States 23 Marshal to serve Defendants. 24 V. Warnings 25 A. Address Changes 26 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 27 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 28 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 2| action. 3 B. Possible Dismissal 4 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 5 | warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 6| 963 F.2d 1258, 1260-61 (9th Cir. 1992) (a district court may dismiss an action for failure 7 | to comply with any order of the Court). 8| ITIS ORDERED: 9 (1) □□□ Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 4) and Motion for 10 | Service by U.S. Marshal (Doc. 5) is denied without prejudice. 11 (2) Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Christiansen v. Young, (D. Ariz. 2022).

Christiansen v. Young (Christiansen v. Young) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related