Choynski v. Commissioner

Board of Tax Appeals

Choynski v. Commissioner

14 B.T.A. 9, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3040

United States Board of Tax Appeals·Decided November 6, 1928·No. Docket No. 14448.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

OPINION.

Marquette :

We are satisfied that the interest in question was received by the petitioner as trustee or agent for his mother, his sister, and certain clients, and that it was accounted for and paid over to those persons in the years in which he received it. In our opinion the respondent erred in including any part of such interest in the petitioner’s income for 1920 and 1921, and we so hold.

Judgment will be entered wnder Bule 50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION.

Marquette :

We are satisfied that the interest in question was received by the petitioner as trustee or agent for his mother, his sister, and certain clients, and that it was accounted for and paid over to those persons in the years in which he received it. In our opinion the respondent erred in including any part of such interest in the petitioner’s income for 1920 and 1921, and we so hold.

Judgment will be entered wnder Bule 50.

Choynski v. Commissioner, 14 B.T.A. 9, 1928 BTA LEXIS 3040 (bta 1928).

Pincite

14 B.T.A. 9 (Choynski v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related