Choate v. Thorndike

138 Mass. 371, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 197
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 10, 1885
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 138 Mass. 371 (Choate v. Thorndike) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Choate v. Thorndike, 138 Mass. 371, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 197 (Mass. 1885).

Opinion

W. Allen, J.

This is an action upon the probate bond of the defendant Thorndike as administrator de bonis non of the estate of Elizabeth F. Hodgdon. The defendant Thorndike was one of the sureties upon the bond of the administratrix of said estate. The administratrix was removed, and he was appointed administrator de bonis non. About six weeks after his appointment, he resigned the office, and H. P. Moulton was appointed to succeed him; and this action is brought for the failure of Thorndike to render an inventory of the estate, and to account for and pay over the assets belonging to it. A breach of the bond by failure to render an. inventory is admitted; the only question is as to the amount for which execution shall issue.

Thorndike, at the time of his appointment, was liable as surety upon the bond of the administratrix for the breach of it in not accounting for assets of the estate received by her. The only question is whether he was bound to account for the amount of such assets. He was liable on the bond for the amount of the assets which the administratrix received and did not account for, and that constituted a debt from him to the estate, which, upon his becoming administrator, was assets in his hands with which he was chargeable, although the amount had not been fixed s by any account rendered, or by judgment, and though he did not in fact charge himself with it. It was his duty as administrator to ascertain the amount and to charge himself with it. It is sufficient to refer to the recent case of Tarbell v. Jewett, 129 Mass. 457, which is directly in point, and where the cases are [372]*372referred to and the whole subject fully considered in the opinion of the court given by Mr. Justice Endicott.

G. B. Ives, for the defendants. C. Sewall, for the plaintiff.

Judgment for the plaintiff affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bassett v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.
68 N.E. 205 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Browne v. Doolittle
25 N.E. 23 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1890)
Stetson v. Moulton
5 N.E. 809 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 Mass. 371, 1885 Mass. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/choate-v-thorndike-mass-1885.