Chitty v. M/V VALLEY VOYAGER

284 F. Supp. 297, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9938
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana
DecidedApril 30, 1968
Docket7184
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 284 F. Supp. 297 (Chitty v. M/V VALLEY VOYAGER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Chitty v. M/V VALLEY VOYAGER, 284 F. Supp. 297, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9938 (E.D. La. 1968).

Opinion

MITCHELL, District Judge.

This action by Leonard Chitty, owner and operator of the Motor Vessel Tide Land, was brought in rem, against the Motor Vessel Valley Voyager, and, in personam, against her owner and operator, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company seeking to recover damages resulting from the foundering and sinking of the Tide Land which occurred on the Mississippi River at New Orleans, in the early morning of August 18, 1964. The issue of liability vel non was tried to the Court on a former day.

The Court, having heard the testimony of the witnesses and having considered the evidence and briefs submitted by counsel, makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I

At all times material hereto the plaintiff, Leonard Chitty, was a person of the full age of majority, a resident of Houma, Louisiana and the owner and operator of the Tide Land.

II

The Tide Land was built in 1956 by Sewart Seacraft of Patterson, Louisiana. She is a twin screw, steel hull, diesel propelled pushboat of 446 total rated horsepower. Her approximate dimensions are 50 feet in overall deck length,. 47 feet in keel length, 16% feet in beam, and she is of 38 gross and 26 net tons.

Approximately ten weeks before the incident in question, the Tide Land was remodeled by Universal Iron Works of Houma, Louisiana without plans, on lines and specifications personally furnished by Mr. Chitty, who has never had any formal training in naval architecture or marine engineering. 1

*299 She was converted from a two to a three-deck level vessel in order to obtain better visibility over empty barges which she might push ahead. Her original pilothouse on the second deck was removed and replaced by a forward bunk room and a new pilothouse was installed as the third deck level.

III

At all times material herein the defendant, Mississippi Valley Barge Line Company, was a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware with its principal office and place of business in St. Louis, Missouri, but doing business in the State of Louisiana. It was the owner and operator of the Valley Voyager, a steel hull, diesel powered, river pushboat of approximately 5,200 horsepower, with approximate dimensions of 185 feet in length and 45 feet in beam. She is of 1,103 gross and 750 net tons. In August, 1964, the Valley Voyager was engaged in transporting large river tows to and from the Port of New Orleans with her destination and departure point being the Valley fleet located on the west (right descending) bank of the Mississippi River immediately below the Celotex Wharf Light (Mile 100.8 AHP).

IV

On the night of August 17, 1964, the Tide Land was at her regular landing near Nine Mile Point on call for harbor work. Her two-man crew consisted of Lawrence J. Billiot, her master for four years, and Horace Scott, her deckhand/cook for four months. Captain Billiot received orders to deliver a fuel flat the following morning to the Valley Voyager, while underway. As was customary, the Tide Land was to accompany the Valley Voyager until underway fueling had been completed, then remove and return the fuel flat to the Valley fleet.

V

At about 2:50 AM the following morning, the Tide Land got underway from the East Bank Fleet, located just above Nine Mile Point on the New Orleans side of the river, enroute to the Valley fleet. At approximately the same time, the Valley Voyager was getting underway upriver, pushing her northbound tow of 24 barges. Due to a change in orders, the Tug Norma G had previously delivered the fuel flat and had tied her off to the starboard side of the Valley Voyager.

Vi

During the Tide Land’s downriver trip, Captain Billiot contacted the Valley Voyager by radio and engaged in a conversation with Captain John C. Crader, a licensed Mississippi River towboat pilot for 20 years, who was on watch and at the controls of the Valley Voyager.

Initially, Captain Billiot’s testimony inferred that during this radio conversation he was ordered by Captain Crader to tie off the Tide Land to the port side of the Valley Voyager.

Captain Billiot’s later admission that he was not "ordered” by Captain Crader to tie up on the port side of the Valley Voyager 2 is substantiated by Captain Crader 3 and Horace Scott. 4 Captain Billiot later conceded that the decision as to whether or not to tie up alongside the Valley Voyager or to follow her upriver was entirely his to make. 5

VII

During or shortly after the conversation with Captain Crader, Captain Billiot sighted the Valley Voyager and her tow rounding Six Mile Point. Captain Billiot continued downstream, rounded up astern of the Valley Voyager and then proceeded to tie off to her port side. Under Captain Billiot’s directions, the mooring was attended to by Mr. Scott, utilizing a new single six inch manila line on both the bow and the stern. 6 The vessels *300 were flush alongside and the main deck levels of each were about the same height. The make up of the Tide Land to the Valley Voyager was observed by Captain Crader. The Tide Land’s location was about midship of the Valley Voyager, with her bow some 20 feet abaft the raised pilothouse of the Valley Voyager, with the latter’s stern overlapping that of the Tide Land by some 40 feet. The Valley Voyager’s pilot had the right to direct the Tide Land not to tie up at all but to follow her upriver. However, Captain Crader approved the tieing off, the location of the Tide Land, her alignment of lines and said all were proper and customary. 7 The Tide Land’s rudder was held amidship and very little propeller power was used thereafter but the captain kept her engine slow ahead to prevent clutch damage. 8 Captain Crader assumed that the Tide Land would not use her own propulsion inasmuch as the Valley Voyager would furnish all propulsion and steering, as was customary, and conceded that he was in overall command' of the flotilla in respect to navigation. 9

VIII

The river was low and the navigation of the flotilla was not encumbered by unusual wind or current conditions.

With the Tide Land alongside, the Valley Voyager proceeded upriver with her tow, rounded Nine Mile Point (Carrollton Bend — a sharp bend to the left for upbound traffic); increased the speed of her engines to full ahead; and proceeded up the straight reach of the river toward Twelve Mile Point. After passing under the Huey P. Long Bridge and due to the presence of three sand dredges located on the left descending bank, Captain Crader reduced the speed of the Valley Voyager’s engines.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Marathon Pipe Line Co. v. Drilling Rig Rowan/Odessa
527 F. Supp. 824 (E.D. Louisiana, 1981)
Shebby Dredging Co. v. Smith Bros., Inc.
469 F. Supp. 1279 (D. Maryland, 1979)
Complaint of Tug Helen B. Moran, Inc.
420 F. Supp. 1282 (S.D. New York, 1976)
Tabago S. A. v. Sprigg Carroll
394 F. Supp. 1354 (S.D. Florida, 1975)
Gulf Oil Corporation v. Tug Gulf Explorer
337 F. Supp. 709 (E.D. Louisiana, 1971)
Houma Well Service, Inc. v. Tug Capt. O'Brien
312 F. Supp. 257 (E.D. Louisiana, 1970)
Chitty v. M/V Valley Voyager
408 F.2d 1354 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)
Chitty v. Valley Voyager
408 F.2d 1354 (Fifth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
284 F. Supp. 297, 1968 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chitty-v-mv-valley-voyager-laed-1968.