Chinn v. Russell

2 Blackf. 171, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 18
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Chinn v. Russell. Read the opinion of the Court — 2 Blackf. 172
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided May 13, 1828·Published

Opinion

THE defendant in replevin avowed the taking of the goods, by virtue of his office as sheriff, on an execution against a third person to whom they belonged. The plaintiff pleaded property in himself. The jury found that some of the goods were the plaintiff’s, and that some were not his. Judgment on the Verdict, and that each party should recover his costs. Held, that, as each party had succeeded, each was entitled to costs; and that the judgment was right. Powell v. Hinsdale, 5 Mass» 343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Chinn v. Russell, 2 Blackf. 171, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 18 (Ind. 1828).

2 Blackf. 171 (Chinn v. Russell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.