Chinn v. Russell

Indiana Supreme Court

Chinn v. Russell

2 Blackf. 171, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 18

DecidedMay 13, 1828

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Blackf. 171 (Chinn v. Russell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Chinn v. Russell, 2 Blackf. 171, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 18 (Ind. 1828).

Pincite

Opinion

THE defendant in replevin avowed the taking of the goods, by virtue of his office as sheriff, on an execution against a third person to whom they belonged. The plaintiff pleaded property in himself. The jury found that some of the goods were the plaintiff’s, and that some were not his. Judgment on the Verdict, and that each party should recover his costs. Held, that, as each party had succeeded, each was entitled to costs; and that the judgment was right. Powell v. Hinsdale, 5 Mass» 343.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE defendant in replevin avowed the taking of the goods, by virtue of his office as sheriff, on an execution against a third person to whom they belonged. The plaintiff pleaded property in himself. The jury found that some of the goods were the plaintiff’s, and that some were not his. Judgment on the Verdict, and that each party should recover his costs. Held, that, as each party had succeeded, each was entitled to costs; and that the judgment was right. Powell v. Hinsdale, 5 Mass» 343.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Blackf. 171, 1828 Ind. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/chinn-v-russell-ind-1828.